Friday, 14 March 2008

Lord Avebury strong letter of support to Qaran's case.

avebury.jpg(qaransomaliland.com) London---January 7, 2007

Dear Lord Malloch-Brown,

I gather you’re seeing President Riyaale tomorrow, and I hope you will raise with him the matters covered in my letters of November 2 and December 26, copies attached for ease of reference. There has been no sign of change in the situation of the Qaran leaders, and there ought to be no EU election funding unless they ate able to participate in the elections.

There is news of a Press Law which has been submitted to Parliament, and you will no doubt ask for details. In December, Somaliland expelled 24 journalists living in Hargeisa having fled from Mogadishu, apparently for writing critically about the Ethiopian occupation forces. From what I hear, the Press Law may contain further restrictions on the right of freedom of expression, which are not compatible with the ICCPR.

The government are also proposing a Human Rights Commission Law, which doesn’t guarantee the independence and impartiality of the Commission. The coup d’état at Shuro-Net by the existing Commission, which I drew to your attention previously, doesn’t inspire confidence in the government’s intentions.

Finally, will you please raise the principle of the separation of the judiciary from the executive. Under the existing constitution the President appoints the Chief Justice, and I think Riyaale has been through 3 so far.

I’m copying this to Baroness Vadeera, who I gather is also seeing President Riyaale.




The Rt Hon the Lord Malloch-Brown,
Foreign & Commonwealth Office,
London SW1A 2AH
MSU.correspondence@fco.gov.uk

MP Alun Michael Pops The Question In 'Prime Minster's Question Time'

Somaliland Presidential delegation with MP Cathy Mcarthy and Alun Michael at Westminster Parliament

Westminster, London, 12 January 2008 (SL Times) - During Prime minister question time at the UK parliament Wednesday, Labour Member of Parliament Alun Michael had put the following question to Gordon Brown in one of Westminster's famed democratic session debate rituals 'Prime Minister's Question Time' regarding Somaliland and Rayale’s visit to Britain and the house:

You are aware, Mr. Speaker, that the President of Somaliland and members of his Cabinet are visiting Parliament at present. Will my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister join me in congratulating Somaliland on the way in which it has worked over the past 18 years, very quietly, through local government elections, parliamentary elections and presidential elections? When the people of the south have no real government and are still in a state of chaos, does not that record command respect from the international community?

Gordon Brown (Prime Minister): “I agree with my right hon. Friend, who is a friend of that country. I welcome the visitors to this country, and we will do everything that we can not only to help with international development for the countries with which we are associated, but to help to build the institutions of democracy.”

Source: Somaliland Times
http://www.somalilandtimes.net/sl/2008/312/3.shtml

Somaliland Government Proposes New ‘Press Law’ To Gag the Free Press & Take its assets.

PRESS RELEASE

16 November 2007

A Joint-Press Statement issued by Somaliland’s leading independent newspapers: Jamhuuriya, Ogaal, Haatuf, Geeska Africa and Saxansaxo

Somaliland government recently submitted a new ‘Press Law’ for the lower house of parliament to legislate into law. The new ‘Press Law’ contains desperate measures by the government to get rid of the independent media, in particular, the independent and privately owned newspapers in circulation.

We, having read the government’s new ‘Press Law’, compiled of 120 articles, and studied the implications in the objectives it underlines in determining the affairs of the country’s media, and in particular, the independent and privately owned newspapers, we see this new ‘press law’ as detrimental to the country’s independent media and the civil liberties that come with exercising the rights to free speech. We find that;

  • The new ‘press law’ was devised and intended solely for the privately owned independent print media and their commercial printers. The new ‘press law’ gives the government the power and authority to shutdown the privately owned independent newspapers and the business operations of the commercial printers who provide them [newspapers] printing services. It is evident that these articles specifically relate to the independent media and not to the government-run, opposition, and NGO media.
  • The new ‘press law’ does not mention in any place or make reference to the current functioning Somaliland press law which for years has been the sole legal source for the country’s governing media laws which was endorsed by parliament and the president.
  • This new ‘press law’ without doubt contravenes ‘article 32’ of the constitution which explicitly describes the sanctity of the freedom of the independent media and the citizen’s rights to freedom of expression. As result, this new ‘press law’ is in blatant breach of ‘article 32’ of the constitution.
  • This new ‘press law’ establishes that the minister of information has the authority and power to temporarily suspend, shut down, confiscate and appropriate the assets of the independent newspapers and the printing facilities and operations of their commercial printers. Moreover, this new ‘press law’ gives the minister of information the power to intervene in a newspaper’s financial operations, internal management and control output material of its production/operations [censorship]. For instance, the new ‘press law’ dictates that paper boys/girls cannot sell newspapers without a valid permit issued from the ministry of information and only then, can they, sell newspapers to the general public. Elsewhere, the new ‘press law’ goes on to state that newspaper reader’s opinion and ‘letters to the editor’ cannot be published without the prior consent and acknowledgement of the ministry of information [censorship]. The same goes for newspaper advertisements; in that the ministry must be informed of all advertisements placed with newspapers and cannot be published without its consent.
  • The new ‘press law’ delegates authority to the ministry of finance to control, investigate and closedown the business operations of the independent newspapers.
  • The new ‘press law’ categorically prohibits independent newspapers from receiving private funds, public contributions and NGO fund-grants from inside and outside the country. It even goes to the extent of forbidding newspapers from receiving public contributions to pay off legal court fines. This goes against the constitutional article which declares that ‘the independent media should have access to funds and resources that enables it to acquire necessary measures and competence in generating income.
  • The new ‘press law’ declares that journalists working for local and international news agencies cannot travel to another region in the country to cover a story without applying for a travel permit from the minister of information, and that the minister has the right to withhold such permit requested by local or foreign journalists in the country.
  • The new ‘press law’ states that all journalists, local and international, must have a registration card ‘journalist permit’ issued by the ministry of information to work in Somaliland as a journalist, and that the ministry has the right to cancel the permit without giving any reason/advance notice to local or foreign journalists working in the country.
  • The new ‘press law’ violates the country’s established ‘judicial statutory laws of the land’ and has classified the legal code of law and rules governing the media as under the provisions of the criminal “penal” courts of the country. This is in blatant disregard to the current press law which stipulates that the media is answerable for its actions in the civil law suit courts of the country.
  • The new ‘press law’ dictates that commercial printers who print newspapers for the independent media will be held responsible for the content material published by newspapers which contravene the articles in this press law. This is intended to scare commercial printers from printing independent newspapers.
  • The new ‘press law’, furthermore, prohibits the media from publishing general public social and economic hardships or issues, like inflation, corruption, unemployment, bad governance, injustice, oppression, usurpation of government office for private interests.

Pre-conclusion

We, the independent and privately owned newspapers of Somaliland and the independent media outlets of Somaliland agree that the government’s new ‘press law’ is devised to silence the independent media and intended to annihilate the independence of the free media and do away with the opportunities and articles enshrined in the constitution which gives the citizens of this country the rights to express their opinions and freewill.

We strongly believe that this new ‘press law’ developed by the government is the ‘final nail in the coffin’ for the independent media, in particular, the free press (newspapers) which we will never see again in the country, if this new ‘press law’ gets the go ahead. As it is, the free press operating in the country have to constantly face and endure daily persistent threats, intimidation, imprisonment and violations to their freedom of expression and human rights when carrying out their duty and profession.

We see the government’s new ‘press law’ as having a direct link to past government actions which blatantly violated the lawful and constitutional rights of the citizens. This law reminds us of previous incidents in which citizens rights were violated by the government, incidents such as:

- when the government broke into the offices of Haatuf newspaper and arrested its journalists without a legal court warrant early in the year and imprisoned the journalists according to criminal charges brought under the old Somali Republic’s 1960’s ‘Criminal Penal Code’ and replaced the current and valid ‘press law’ which stipulates all media legal matters be settled in ‘civil courts’;

- when, the government unlawfully broke into the compound and offices of the election commission and took charge of the commission, forcing the commissioners out of office;.

- when the government illegally installed its own appointees over the legitimate board of directors of the human rights umbrella group, Shuronet;

- and also, the government’s recent unlawful detention and imprisonment of the Qaran leaders.

The implications of the government’s new ‘press law’ is not limited to just the independent media in the country, but is the first, of worse things to come, which the government of Dahir Rayale Kahin has in store for the people of this nation, that is, paving the road to an authoritarian dictatorship. This will be the end of the democratic and multiparty system of Somaliland which so many have died and sacrificed their loved ones, wealth and wellbeing for.

Conclusion

For these and many more reasons, we urge the lower house of parliament to out-rightly reject the government’s new ‘press law’ and preserve their self-respect by even not entertaining its debate and house deliberation.

We urge the general public in Somaliland, the opposition political parties, human rights groups and media (NGO) organisations, whether local or international, to oppose and campaign against this ‘self-defeating’ and ‘self-destructing’ new ‘press law’ of the government which will be a catastrophic blow to the independent media of the country and the freedom of expression enshrined in Somaliland’s democratic system of government and institutions.

Signed by:

1- Faysal Ali Sheekh - Chairman Jamhuuriya

2- Ali Abdi Diini - Editor Haatuf

3- Muuse Faarah Jaambiir - Chairman Ogaal

4- Mahamed Huseen (Rambo) - Editor Geeska Africa

5- Abdillahi Mahamed Daahir (Cukuse) - Chairman Saxansaxo

Source: Somaliland Times

http://somalilandtimes.net/sl/2007/304/3.shtml
http://somalilandpresslaw.blogspot.com

The New Somaliland Press & Publications Bill 2007

EDITORIAL:
Thursday, 10 January 2008
thumb_big-ben-tower-239894.jpg

The Somaliland Government has recently sent to the House of Representatives a new Bill on press and publications. The provisions of this bill (based almost entirely on the Yemen Law No: 25 of 1990 on the Press & Publications) run contrary to international norms relating to freedom of expression and the independence of the press and are not in line with the Somaliland constitution.

The considerable powers given to the Minister of Information (and other ministers) include even deciding on appeals from anyone whose writings have been turned down for publication by a newspaper's editor (Article 46). These ministerial powers over the press and publishers/printers/distributers etc, the compulsory registration of all press and publication activities, including the practice of the profession of journalism, and the extensive criminal sanctions which add to the existing array of criminal offences in the 1962 Somali Penal Code contrast sharply with the current Somaliland Press Law (2004), which contains no criminal sanctions and is based on codes of conduct. Unfortunately the Somaliland Government has repeatedly made clear its dissatisfaction with the current press Law and has used the Penal Code and extra-judicial powers to detain and imprison journalists. It is no surprise, therefore, that the Somaliland Government is not putting forward amendments of the current Press Law, but is now proposing its wholesale replacement by this new Bill which introduces considerable criminal sanctions, such as fines and imprisonment (Article 99) for the infringement of its numerous provisions, as well as prohibition of continued practice of journalism or publication or even circulation of printed materials; confiscation of property, including printing presses (Article 101) and seizure of printed materials (Article 102).

In a well publicised recent interview (on VOA, Somali Service, on 26/12/2007), President Rayaale denied that there is any "proper law" currently dealing with the Press and described the Press Law (which he signed into Law in 2004) as one "written by them (?) And which is in conflict with the constitution and the laws". He added that if a law does not include punishment or criminal sanctions ( ciqaab), "it cannot be law" and opined that a "law is one which lays down punishment". Referring to this new Bill that the Government has now sent to the parliament, he said they borrowed it "from the developed world" and added that one should follow the example of "what works in advanced countries".



This disapproval of the current Press Law was underlined by the Supreme Court's ruling last year which, incorrectly, in our view, described the law as subordinate "regulations" ( xeer-nidaamiye). Without considering whether some of the old criminal sanctions in the 1962 Penal Code survived the provisions of the Somaliland Constitution or the Press Law, the Court upheld the convictions of journalists for, among other Penal Code offences, the crime of insulting the President and blaming him for the actions of his government (Article 220 – a replica of Articles 278 & 279 of the 1930 Italian Penal Code).



There is nothing wrong with borrowing laws that work, but, in this area of freedom of the press, the Somaliland Government's choice of countries to emulate has not led it to turn to places that can be considered as models of good practice. The bill which pre-dated the 2004 Somaliland Press Law was initially based, word for word, on the Ethiopian Press Proclamation No. 34/1992, which had been very widely criticised. And now, despite public statements by the Government that this new Bill was proposed by experts in media law, it is, in reality, a wholesale re-production of the 1990 Yemeni Law, with amendments which increased the criminal sanctions. It has been reported that even Yemen is considering repealing this law, and organisations, like Article 19, have already criticised the provisions of the Yemeni law.



Somalilandlaw.com urges the House of Representatives to reject this Bill completely. Somaliandlaw.com recommends, instead, that:

* improvements of the current Press Law be made, in consultation with the media and the civil society;
* the self regulation of the press be strengthened;
* a modern civil law dealing with issues of libel be adopted;
* all the numerous criminal sanctions in the (1930s based) Somali Penal Code affecting the press be repealed;
* registration of press activities beyond that which is necessary for all businesses be abolished;
* separate broadcasting laws, including one which will make publicly owned broadcasting independent of the government be introduced; and
* measures to entrench freedom of information and expression should be introduced.

The various issues in the Bill relating to publications, in general, copyright and the National Library are better dealt with in a more modern and less restrictive separate law(s).



Ibrahim Hashi Jama

Souorce: www.somalilandlaw.com

Thank you letter from the leadership of Qaran

Thursday, 03 January 2008


thumb_qaranleaders.jpgWe would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your efforts in supporting the democratization process in Somaliland., we also wish to extend our gratitude for your relentless exertion and concern in securing our release during the last four months and twenty three days we have been unjustly imprisoned by the current Somaliland government.

The international community continues to engage with Somaliland on a range of different issues, mostly directed at the continued progress towards democratization and economic development and in this regard we would like to urge you to continue your support and engagement in bringing about the kind of government that will practice good and responsible governance that is responsive to the wishes of the its people.

Furthermore, with the coming local and presidential elections, Somaliland faces additional hurdles of conducting a voter registration process and unresolved Constitutional questions about new political association vying to take part in the political process of the country.

This will require intense and sustained commitment from the international community, patience and willingness to resolve all disputes with civility, dialogue, respect for the other and a strong commitment to resolve differences by peaceful means, so that Somaliland can remain an island of stability in the volatile region of the Horn of Africa.

We are confident that the people of Somaliland and members of the international community that have invested time and resources to foster peace, stability, democracy and the rule of law will once again rise to the occasion and make Somaliland a viable and successful member of the expanding democratic global village.

Wishing you all a happy, peaceful and prosperous new year.

Sincerely,

Chairman of Qaran

Dr. Mohamed A. Gabose,

1st Vice Chair of Qaran

Eng. Mohamed Hashi Elmi

2nd Vice Chair of Qaran

Jamal Aidid Ibrahim

Special thanks go to:


Amnesty International East Africa.

Amnesty International UK

Amnesty International US

European Union Representative Hargeysa

European Union Representative Nairobi


British Embassy Addis Ababa

American Embassy Nairobi

Finish Embassy Nairobi

Norwegian Embassy London

Swedish Embassy London


House of Lords London

House of Commons London

Welsh Assembly Government London

US Congress Washington DC

US Department of State Washington DC

International Republican Institute Washington DC


Somaliland Democracy Group

Somaliland Forum

East Africa Policy Institute Washington DC

SIRAG London


Hon.Michael Allen MP UK Parliament

Hon.Kerry McCarthy, MP UK Parliament

Ibrahim Hashi Jama Somaliland Lawyer

Lord Avebury House of Lords London

Sir Mark Malloch Brown London

Annemia Neysts-Uyttebroeck MEP Brussels

Lynn Fredrickson AI Washington DC

Donald Payne US Congress Washington DC

Sen. Joseph Biden US Senate Washington DC

Sen. Barak Obama US Senate Washington DC

qaransomaliland.com


Wednesday, 2 January 2008

Supportive letter from Lord Avebury insisiting on full democracy in Somaliland

avebury.jpg(qaransomaliland.com)-London-UK

From Lord Avebury P0726124

020-7274 4617
December 26, 2007


To Lord Malloch Brown

Minister Foreign & Commonwealth Office,
London SW1A 2AH

Dear Lord Malloch-Brown,

Further to my letter of November 2 about the situation in Somaliland, ref P0721112, copy attached, (to which I don’t appear to have had a reply), you will have been advised of the conditional release of the three leaders. I attach an article by Mahdi A. Abdi of the East Africa Policy Institute on the questions that arise from this decree by the President, and an article from the Somaliland Times of December 22 on this subject.

I understand that the Somaliland Minister of Finance is in Nairobi, where he was expecting to finalise details of the EU’s funding of the elections, as well as other aid projects. Whilst any humanitarian aid should continue, it would be wrong for the EU to subsidise elections which can’t be free and fair, since important players are still to be excluded from participation. I do hope we shall use our influence in Brussels to ensure that aid for the elections is suspended until the right to campaign and put up candidates, who may include the three leaders who were imprisoned for 144 days, is extended to the Qaran Political Assocation.

Yours sincerely,

Eric Avebury

fco_markmallochbrown2.jpg Lord Malloch-Brown,
Foreign & Commonwealth Office,
London SW1A 2AH










.......................................................................................

One step forward, two steps backward.


Written by Mahdi A. Abdi logo-red.jpgWe find the news of the release of Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gabose and his vice chairs from jail (Mohamed Hashi Elmi and Jamal Aydeed Ibrahim of the Qaran political association) as a very good step toward Somaliland’s steady progress toward democracy and the rule of law. It is gratifying to see the president choose reason and good judgment and bring to an end the campaign of suppressing the aspiration of nescient political associations by detentions and threats.

The recent statements coming out of the president which declared that the recently released politicians will not be allowed to run for political offices for the next five years seem to negate the initial positive action taken by him when he released them from jail. It also raises more questions than it answers:
For instance, without getting into the legality of the matter, does this mean that this presidential decree applies only to the three leaders or is it a blanket ruling affecting the whole Qaran political association?

The reason why no-one seems to know exactly what is going on in this president’s administration is that most everything is done through statements made by the president or his ministers, the courts and the judicial system are completely missing in action, and as a matter of fact the recently released Qaran leaders have yet to see any documentation from any governmental institution informing them of the terms of their release or even as to the reason of their release.

The difficulty for the president is that it is never an easy matter to rule by decrees and not clash with existing laws in a democracy. Having failed at getting the Qaran leaders to “ask” for a pardon and accept the ruling of the kangaroo court that illegally (in the eyes of the international and Somaliland communities) sentence them to a lengthy jail term, he unilaterally took the action of releasing them and now demands that they stop fighting for what they have been imprisoned for the last 123 days in Mandhera, or else…

There is very little chance that the leadership of Qaran and its supporters are going to cease and desist from what they see as their fundamental right to participate in the political process and veil threats from the president of future punitive actions to those who do not heed his warnings are not going to dissuade them from backing away from insisting on having access to all the rights and guarantees enshrined in the country’s Constitution.

Democracy can be a messy affair and it is by no means a perfect system, but the most important aspect of it is that it allows equal access to the process to those who adopt it as a system of governance. And Constitutional laws safeguard the rights of citizens so that no one is above the law (including the president) and equity and fairness are guaranteed to all the stakeholders in the country.

The question is not whether the country can have more than three parties, and Qaran is not making that argument, the question is whether political associations are allowed in the Constitution, and whether it guarantees the rights of the citizens to be elected into an office and to vote.

If the president insists that citizens are not allowed to form political associations and participate in the political affairs of the country, then how can he explain away article 22 of the Somaliland Constitution, which clearly states the following:


“Article 22: Political, Economic, Social and Electoral Rights

1. Every citizen shall have the right to participate in the political, economic, social and cultural affairs in accordance with the laws and the Constitution.

2. Every citizen who fulfils the requirements of the law shall have the right to be elected (to an office) and to vote.

The only legal manner in which Qaran can be denied the right to participate in the coming election is to amend this article (22) in the Somaliland Constitution and remove these fundamental rights it grants its citizens of Somaliland.

The president used the term "pardon" with deliberate care because it came with all the needed strings attached to make it possible for him to disqualify the "Qaran" politicians from running for any office while he is a candidate.

This is a direct translation of the release letter from the president:

The president of the republic of Somaliland, having seen article 90/5 of the Somaliland Constitution, after seeing article 149 of the Penal code, having seen the judgment of the Hargeysa Regional Court MGH/DDL/424/2007, after listening to the advice of elders and Sultans, and taking into consideration the blessings of Eid Al Adxa has determined:

1. To extend a “special pardon” to erase the remainder of their jail term adjudicated by the Hargeysa Regional Court of said prisoners:

Mohamed Abdi Gaboose
Mohamed Hashi Elmi
Jamal Aydeed Ibrahim

2. I order their release before the celebration of Eid Day.”

According to a news report from the “Horn of Africa”, knowledgeable sources state that in order to diffuse the tense political situation in the country the elders who were involved in the mediation requested from the president an amnesty (Article 144 of the Penal code which grants no strings attached and all previous judgments to be vacated) for the jailed politicians instead of the partial pardon used by the president.

Furthermore Article 101/2 of the Penal code which was used by the Hargeysa Court which bans the Qaran politicians from voting or being voted for is inherited from Italy’s 1930 Mussolini’s Penal code and is in complete disagreement with Article 130/5 the current Somaliland Constitution which indicates that no law can violate Islamic law and the fundamental rights of the citizen. The Constitution being the supreme law of the land, it is clear that much of what the president has done so far goes against the letter as well as the spirit of the Constitution of the country.

The question remains whether the EU and other donor nations which have been instrumental in nudging the current administration to respect its own laws will continue to do so and insist on a full and a fair democracy to bloom in Somaliland and demand that the Qaran politicians be allowed to participate in the coming elections cycle by having the president vacate the odious Hargeysa Court judgment which is used to keep them from exercising their guaranteed Constitutional fundamental rights.

We urge all concerned communities, whether local or international to impress upon the president that the rule of law must prevail and checks and balances must be evident, the Media, all legal associations and Human Rights organizations must be free to practice their trade before democracy can be felt at the grass root level and Somaliland can rightfully claim to be truly a democratic nation.

East Africa Policy Institute.
Mahdi A. Abdi.
http://eastafricapi.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=136&Itemid=1


QARAN Leaders Will Continue To Be Banned From Politics

QARAN chairman Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gabose (center) and his two deputies Mohamed Hashi Elmi (L) and Jamal Aideed Ibrahim (R), soon after their release in Hargeysa

Hargeysa, Somaliland, December 22, 2007 (SL Times) – “The three top leaders of the QARAN political association will continue to be banned from politics despite their release from prison on Tuesday,” said Yusuf Tallabo, Somaliland's Deputy Minister of Justice.

QARAN chairman Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gabose and his two deputies Mohamed Hashi Elmi and Jamal Aideed Ibrahim were arrested on July 28 and sentenced on August 8, 2007 by a regional court to 3 years and nine months in prison. The court also banned the 3 leaders from politics for 5 years for founding an illegal organization and endangering public order through staging of political rallies.

The QARAN political association was proclaimed on April 2007. But the government has since been denying it registration as a political organization on the basis of a constitutional clause that limits the number of political parties in Somaliland to three QARAN's argument has been that whilst it true that only 3 political parties should exist in the country at any given time, it doesn't mean that those political parties should be UDUB, KULMIYE and UCID forever.

According to QARAN, the country's 3 national parties should emerge from the municipal elections which are contested once every 5 years and are constitutionally designed to produce the 3 national parties until the next local council elections.

Fearing that the formation of new political associations might endanger the existence of his weak UDUB party, Mr. Rayale responded by ordering the arrest and prosecution of Dr. Gabose, Mohamed Hashi and Jamal Aideed. Faced with countrywide protests against the imprisonment not to mention continuous international pressure, Mr. Rayale finally agreed to release the three QARAN leaders from the Mandera maximum security prison where they had been held for 144 days.

Mr. Rayale had repeatedly demanded that the prisoners petition him for clemency, but the QARAN leaders refused to do so saying that they had committed no crime and they were unjustly imprisoned for their political views. Presidnet Rayale’s release of QARAN leaders was in response to a request for amnesty by clan elders.

Around midnight Monday, the 3 men were informed by the prison guards that they were pardoned and were being taken to Hargeysa.

However on Thursday Mr. Yusuf Tallabo told a VOA reporter that the 3 QARAN leaders will not be allowed to exercise their political rights.

Until now, QARAN leaders have not been shown the text of the presidential pardon that ordered their release.

According to Dr. Gabose the government doesn't want to make the decree public so as to be able to write it down in the future as a conditional release that doesn't cover our ban from politics.

"Their plan is to invoke the order banning us from politics if we don't disband QARAN. In any case it's blackmail, and it's typical of the Rayale regime," said Gabose.

The QARAN leaders are expected to visit the Attorney General's office this morning to ask for a copy of the presidential pardon.

Under the Somaliland constitution, the president can pardon or grant amnesty to convicted individuals or a group of prisoners. But there are no bylaws or procedures for the implementation of the constitution’s article 90 regarding "pardon" and "amnesty".

In the QARAN case, the government’s prosecutor had utilized the Somalia penal code and criminal procedures code. According to that law, the Somaliland House of Representatives is to assume the power of granting an amnesty in the same way as Somalia's National Assembly was vested with such power.

Meanwhile QARAN leaders vowed to continue to exercise their political rights.

According to the Somaliland constitution (article 22), every citizen has the right to participate in the political, economic, social and cultural affairs; and every citizen has the right to elect and to be elected. Article 23 gives citizens the right for political association.

These two articles in addition to article 32 which guarantees freedom of the press, are among the articles in the constitution (bill of rights) that cannot be amended or changed by any branch of the government (see article 127 on amendments or corrections to the constitution).

Then there is law No: 14/2000 for the registration of political parties and associations. This law has not been annulled and therefore remains valid and applicable.

However the government had disbanded the registration committee in 2003 so as to avoid submission of applications for the formation of political associations in 2007.

Source: Somaliland Times
http://www.somalilandtimes.net/sl/2007/309/1.shtml

Shuro-Net Press Release

Monday, 10 December 2007

thumb_60935575_4bc871cd0c.jpg(qaransomaliland.com) Hargeysa--10/12/2007--On the occasion of the anniversary of the Human Rights Day, 10 December 2007, the Preparatory Committee of the up-coming General Meeting (GM) on 23 December 2007 and all members of the Original Shuro-net, likes to congratulate and support the Congress of the European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party (ELDR). In a letter dated 27/11/07 to the President of Somaliland, H. E. Dahir Rayale Kahin, the President of ELDR, Mrs. Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck MEP told that her party "adopted a resolution that calls upon the European Union and all of its Member States to give diplomatic recognition to the Republic of Somaliland and actively encourages the African Union to accept that Somaliland is not a secessionist state but rather a democratic entity that has abrogated a union with a failed State. However, our call is conditioned by the existence of a government that respects human rights, a free market, and democracy, with a free press and the possibility of democratic changes of government".

The reason for this is, the letter continues, "in a region of the world where these qualities are in short supply, your country is a beacon of democracy". But ELDR was alarmed by the arrest on 28/7/07 of Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gabose, Engineer Mohamed Hashi Elmi and Mr. Jama Aideed Warsame, the leaders of Qaran Political Association, which she sees can have a serious consequence for Somaliland's recognition.

In a letter to Mr. Javier Solana, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union, the ELDR President is blunter as she says "Somaliland's current political system and its leadership are failing to meet the minimum standards expected of a free and democratic State. Neither does the Somaliland government respect international human rights laws such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights". These are serious accusations.

The courageous support by one of the three main parties of the European Union is so far the best thing that happened to Somaliland's quest for international recognition. But Somaliland does not realise what it is missing. The ELDR, other supporters and friends seem to be getting wary and their goodwill is being eroded by careless Government violations against human rights and the standard pillars of democratic behaviour in Somaliland. Glaring examples are the arrest of the three top leaders of Qaran Political Association, the increasing suppression of the freedom of the press and the usurpation of the office of Shuro-net, the umbrella organization of the civil society human rights network.

The friends of Somaliland including Lord Avebury, senior member of the British House of Lords; SIRAJ; Professor I. M. Lewis; Somaliland Focus and Somaliland Forum believe that the Government's uncanny behaviour is not helping them to continue airing their support for Somaliland's international recognition. The ELDR President said, "These unlawful processes have already set the cause of Somaliland's recognition back, and if continued, must inevitably halt progress for the time being". This is a dire warning.

The GM Preparatory Committee and all members of the Original Shuro-net find it strange the Somaliland Government's attitude to ignore the many concerns of the international community as well as the frequent appeals within the country about the deteriorating situation of human rights in Somaliland. We honestly urge the Government, in particular the President H. E. Dahir Rayale Kahin, to heed the cries for caution and reverse Somaliland's sinking image in the eyes of the world. Instead of meddling in human rights issues like the freedom of the press, the arbitrary arrests of citizens and the gagging of human rights organizations, it is better to bask in the victory of Lasanod which lifts the people's spirit of patriotism and unity.

The country is passing a promising time when the population need not be pushed to desperation and mistrust, but instead given hope that at last the dark clouds of doom are lifting. Confidence building measures to break the ice that goes down well inside and outside Somaliland are: 1) the immediate and unconditional release of the leaders of Qaran Political Association, 2) the release of all detainees under the Public Order Law and 3) the abolition of the illegal Security Committees and lastly the respect of fundamental rights of Somaliland citizens.

Somaliland Human Rights Organisations Network (SHURO-Net)
Legitimate SHURO-Net Group