Showing posts with label feedom of speech. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feedom of speech. Show all posts

Friday, 14 March 2008

Letter from the European Commission

Friday, 22 February 2008

josemanuel.jpg
President of the European Commission José Manuel Barossa
In a letter addressed to the president of the European Liberal Democratic and Reform Party Ms Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, the President of the European Commission José Manuel Barossa confirmes that the EC Envoy for Somalia has directly engaged with the Somaliland authorieties on the issue of political associations being permitted to participate freely and, more generally, on the democratization process which should lead to presidential and local elections in 2008., to be supported, inter alia. by the European Commission.

Brussels 08.02.2008

Ms. Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck , MEP
President
European Liberal, Democratic and Reform party, aisbl
31, Rue Montoyor,
1000 Brussells

thumb_annemie.jpg

Dear President,

thank you for your letter on 27 November, 2007. I am likewise concerned the recent the recent development in Somaliland, including the arrests last summer of three leaders of Somaliland's QARAN'S political party and increasing tension with Puntland over the town of Lasanood.

I wish to reassure you that the EU has made a public statements under the Portugese President. Voicing its concern about the evolving situation in Somaliland and calling for restraint and space for dialogue and reconciliation. Furthermore, the EC Special Envoy for Somalia has directly engaged with the Somaliland authorieties on the issue of political associations being permitted to participate freely and, more generally, on the democratization process which should lead to presidential and local elections in 2008., to be supported, inter alia. by the European Commission.

The EU remains committed to maintaining concerted pressure on Somaliland government to address the ban on formation of political associations, release political prisoners, and participate in a good faith in a consensual process on the issue of the electoral time frame and voter registration and it encourages and supports the new National Electoral Commission (NEC) to take a leading role in this process. We are pleased, in this regard, that political detained were released in December.

Yours sincerely,

José Manuel Barossa


Source: Qaran

Lord Avebury strong letter of support to Qaran's case.

Saturday, 08 March 2008

thumb_avebury.jpg Lord Avebury responds to Dr. Gabose's letter and continues to press Lord Malloch-Brown KCMG, Foreign & Commonwealth Office to impress upon the Somaliland administration to allow free and fair elections in Somaliland. He makes one of his strongest arguments yet why Qaran should participate in the coming elections.

From Lord Avebury P0807033

020-7274 4617
March 7, 2008

Dear Mark,

Further to our correspondence about the treatment of the Qaran Political Association in Somaliland, I attach a memorandum which has been emailed to me from Dr Mohamed A Gabose, Chairman of the QPA, about the continuing restrictions on their activities.

I share Dr Gabose’s concerns as you know, and whilst I have always been a staunch friend of Somaliland and an advocate of their right to self-determination, I hope we and the European Commission are doing our utmost to persuade President Rayaale to find ways of allowing the QPA and others to participate in the local elections. If the QPA have a sizeable following it would be unfortunate to put it mildly if those people are disenfranchised. If on the other hand they represent only a handful of electors, it would be no skin off the noses of the three establishment parties if they are allowed to put up candidates.

The Rt Hon the Lord Malloch-Brown KCMG,
Foreign & Commonwealth Office,
London SW1A 2AH

Letter from Qaran's Chairman Dr. Gabose

Thursday, 06 March 2008

thumb_drgabose.jpgQaran’s case
Hargeisa, March/06/2008


Somaliland’s democracy is based on the multiparty system(see article 9/1 of the Somaliland Constitution) it is on this basis that the next election is scheduled to take place at the municipal level on July 7, 2008 and the presidential election on Aug. 31, 2008.

We (Qaran Political Association) believe that we stand on strong legal ground when we assert that we have every right to participate in the coming local election, and if successful at that level, we also are aiming to contest in the presidential one as well. Our argument is not based on fancy legal footwork, nor do we seek to establish a new paradigm, what we are asking for, and in effect demanding, is to have the same chance and to have access to the same process the current existing parties went through when they qualified to become the three (3) national parties.

Replenishing our democracy with regular elections where the people have a real chance to choose among new and old ideas can only improve the chances of this young democracy to take roots in Somaliland. Allowing a larger participatory base (instead of just three parties) is also conducive to maintaining stability and curbs inevitable resentments generated when a given group is excluded from the process.

Unfortunately the current administration has chosen a different path, this path is one in which the rule of law and due process have taken a distinctive lesser role and are trumped by totalitarian tendencies disguised as a democratic exercise. Illegal detentions and draconian judgments issued by discredited courts have been deployed against us in order to keep us from exercising our most basic fundamental citizen rights, and that is to vote, or to be voted into office.

For all practical purposes this government has rendered us non citizens when it stripped from us our right to vote or to be voted into office. To add insult to injury, this action goes squarely against the Somaliland Constitution which guarantees the right to vote as a fundamental right that cannot be amended by any branch of government (Legislative, Judiciary, and Executive), see articles 22/2, 127/d and 130/5.

In addition the Somaliland administration is adamantly opposed to opening up the registration process for new political association, and entertaining the notion that the difficulty lies in time constraints instead of a stubborn president who steadfastly refuses to open a single registration office where new political entities can submit their papers is a false choice, and is one the EU and US donor nations should be wary of.

The solution does not lie in compelling us (Qaran) to join the existing three parties, if we felt they represented our ideals and values we would have done so without the hardship of detentions and all subsequent insults and harassments. For us, this is a matter of principle, the democratic principle which should be defended and safeguarded from the impulse of reaching and expedient solution which could result in depriving us of our most fundamental right.

Opening up the process not just for Qaran, but to all qualified contesters is not just the right thing to do, but will be an essential component in holding a peaceful and inclusive election in the country. Allowing parties in power to develop strategic chock holds that deny the rest of the population the true choice of democracy will foster discontent and may lead us to the path of unintended consequences.

We continue to be impressed by the strong support and special attention given to our case by the international community and are thankful for the opportunity provided to us by the Undersecretary for African Affairs Dr. Frazer on her recent visit to Hargeisa when she included us into her busy agenda and gave us a chance to make our case.

The EU has been equally forceful in delivering a strong message to the Somaliland administration as the letter from the EU president Mr. Jose Barroso to Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck the president of ELDR indicates where he points out that:

“The EC Special Envoy for Somalia has directly engaged with the Somaliland authorities on the issue of political associations being permitted to participate freely and, more generally, on the democratization process which should lead to Presidential and local elections in 2008, to be supported, inter alia, by the European Commission.
The EU remains committed to maintaining concerted pressure on the Somaliland government to address the ban on the formation of political association”

We remain committed to continue our struggle and redouble our efforts to bring about the change we seek peacefully and with deliberate care, and we hope all who value the democratic process, honest debate and the exchange of ideas in the political market place will stand with us.

As the famous slave abolitionary figure Fredrick Douglas once said “Power concedes nothing without demand”. This statement was true then and remains so today.
We are engaged in a good fight and we aim to stand firm on the solid grounds of democracy, legality and liberty.

It is our fervent hope that you will stand with us.

Dr. Mohamed A.Gabose
Chairman of
Qaran Political Association


Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Frazer, and special envoy Yates meet with Qaran .

Sunday, 03 February 2008

thumb_amb_frazer1.jpg
Ambassador Frazer
(qaransomaliland.com)- Hargeysa
In a surprise visit to Somaliland a high US delegation led by Assistant Secretary Jendayi Frazer and Special Envoy to Somalia Ambassador Yohn M Yates met with president Rayale, the opposition Parties and Qaran leaders separetely.The meeting was held in neutral grounds at Hotel Ambassador.

The opposition parties met with the delegation first, followed by the chairman of Qaran Dr. Gabose, and the president was seen last. The meeting was set in such a format to put everyone present on an equal footing.

Dr. Gabose and his associates presented papers to the US delegation which in addition to Dr. Frazer and Ambassador Yates also included Nole Garey, Somalia/Djibouti Desk Officer. The US delegation was well informed about the difficulties facing Qaran and showed great interest and simpathy as Dr Gabose pointed out to them the lack tollerance for difference of political views shown by this Somaliland administration and its inabilty to engage in a constructive dialogue without resorting to illigal dentantions, constant threats and intimidations to those entities that dare challenge its positon.
amb._john_yates2.jpg
Somalia Special Envoy Ambassador Yates


The timing of the US delegation visit coincided with the Somaliland Parliament's response to Qaran' s request to address the political impass between them and the administration. In a letter released to the press yesterday from the Parliament signed by deputy Speaker Mr Abdiassis "Samaale" the Somaliland Parliament is for the first time on the record when it comes to the issue of Qaran's political standing and the validity of law N.14.

The letter which was also hand delivered to the US delegation by Dr Gabose addressed three subjects:

1. It expressed deep sorrow on the injustices and what the Parliament sees as violations of their rights as citizens on their illigal detention and offerd words of encoragements while praising their patience.
2. It reaffirmed the Constitution and declared that no branch of the government has the authority to strip citizens of their fundamental rights (in this case the right to vote and to be voted into office).
3. It validated the legality of Law N.14 wich is the law used in the previous presidential elections and declared it to be the only election law in existance until a new law is passed to replace it.

Equal time was given to each party and the US delegation departed within hours after arriving in Hargeysa this morning.

qaransomaliland.com Hargeysa.

Lord Malloch- Brown follow up letter


Monday, 11 February 2008

Lord Malloch- Brown follow up letter to Lord Avebury discussing issues raised by his office to president Rayale and his delegation during their visit in London.

Concerns over human rights and the arrest and detention of members of the Qaran association were raised and it was pointed out to the president that donors will continue to invest in Somaliland, including support for elections, on the basis of progress on democratization being maintained.

"We will continue to work with the Somaliland Authorities to encourage and support progress and will continue to urge them to meet the responsibilities of government that they claim and wish to see recognized".

Lord Malloch-Brown.....

Foreign & Commonwealth Office

London SWIA 2AH

From the Minister of State.

Your reference: P0726124 and P0702112

Our Reference: 54277

thumb_avebury.jpgThe Rt. Hon. Lord Avebury

House of Lords

London

SWIA OPW



Dear Sir,

Thank you for your letter of 2 November and 26 December about ShuroNet and the arrest and detention of three Qaran politicians and their recent release.

Whilst I recognize the good progress that Somaliland authorities have made on democracy and stability, further improvements are needed. I am particularly concerned that the Somaliland Authorities make all efforts during the period prior to the July and August 2008 elections to ensure democracy and human rights are upheld. I met Somaliland Leaders, including Mr. Dahir Rayale Kahin at the Foreign and Commonwealth office on 8 January , when I raised my concerns over human rights and the arrest and detention of members of the Qaran association. I emphasized that donors will continue to invest in Somaliland, including support for elections, on the basis of progress on democratization being maintained. I understand that the all Party Parliamentary Group for Somaliland also held meetings with Mr. Rayale and his party on 9 January and hope that you were also able to raise these issues with him directly. I will continue to follow the situation in Somaliland closely, as will my colleagues in the Department of International Development and our European partners. We will continue to work with the Somaliland Authorities to encourage and support progress and will continue to urge them to meet the responsibilities of government that they claim and wish to see recognized.

The Rt. Hon. Lord Malloch –Brown

Minister of State.

Lord Avebury strong letter of support to Qaran's case.

avebury.jpg(qaransomaliland.com) London---January 7, 2007

Dear Lord Malloch-Brown,

I gather you’re seeing President Riyaale tomorrow, and I hope you will raise with him the matters covered in my letters of November 2 and December 26, copies attached for ease of reference. There has been no sign of change in the situation of the Qaran leaders, and there ought to be no EU election funding unless they ate able to participate in the elections.

There is news of a Press Law which has been submitted to Parliament, and you will no doubt ask for details. In December, Somaliland expelled 24 journalists living in Hargeisa having fled from Mogadishu, apparently for writing critically about the Ethiopian occupation forces. From what I hear, the Press Law may contain further restrictions on the right of freedom of expression, which are not compatible with the ICCPR.

The government are also proposing a Human Rights Commission Law, which doesn’t guarantee the independence and impartiality of the Commission. The coup d’état at Shuro-Net by the existing Commission, which I drew to your attention previously, doesn’t inspire confidence in the government’s intentions.

Finally, will you please raise the principle of the separation of the judiciary from the executive. Under the existing constitution the President appoints the Chief Justice, and I think Riyaale has been through 3 so far.

I’m copying this to Baroness Vadeera, who I gather is also seeing President Riyaale.




The Rt Hon the Lord Malloch-Brown,
Foreign & Commonwealth Office,
London SW1A 2AH
MSU.correspondence@fco.gov.uk

Wednesday, 2 January 2008

Supportive letter from Lord Avebury insisiting on full democracy in Somaliland

avebury.jpg(qaransomaliland.com)-London-UK

From Lord Avebury P0726124

020-7274 4617
December 26, 2007


To Lord Malloch Brown

Minister Foreign & Commonwealth Office,
London SW1A 2AH

Dear Lord Malloch-Brown,

Further to my letter of November 2 about the situation in Somaliland, ref P0721112, copy attached, (to which I don’t appear to have had a reply), you will have been advised of the conditional release of the three leaders. I attach an article by Mahdi A. Abdi of the East Africa Policy Institute on the questions that arise from this decree by the President, and an article from the Somaliland Times of December 22 on this subject.

I understand that the Somaliland Minister of Finance is in Nairobi, where he was expecting to finalise details of the EU’s funding of the elections, as well as other aid projects. Whilst any humanitarian aid should continue, it would be wrong for the EU to subsidise elections which can’t be free and fair, since important players are still to be excluded from participation. I do hope we shall use our influence in Brussels to ensure that aid for the elections is suspended until the right to campaign and put up candidates, who may include the three leaders who were imprisoned for 144 days, is extended to the Qaran Political Assocation.

Yours sincerely,

Eric Avebury

fco_markmallochbrown2.jpg Lord Malloch-Brown,
Foreign & Commonwealth Office,
London SW1A 2AH










.......................................................................................

One step forward, two steps backward.


Written by Mahdi A. Abdi logo-red.jpgWe find the news of the release of Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gabose and his vice chairs from jail (Mohamed Hashi Elmi and Jamal Aydeed Ibrahim of the Qaran political association) as a very good step toward Somaliland’s steady progress toward democracy and the rule of law. It is gratifying to see the president choose reason and good judgment and bring to an end the campaign of suppressing the aspiration of nescient political associations by detentions and threats.

The recent statements coming out of the president which declared that the recently released politicians will not be allowed to run for political offices for the next five years seem to negate the initial positive action taken by him when he released them from jail. It also raises more questions than it answers:
For instance, without getting into the legality of the matter, does this mean that this presidential decree applies only to the three leaders or is it a blanket ruling affecting the whole Qaran political association?

The reason why no-one seems to know exactly what is going on in this president’s administration is that most everything is done through statements made by the president or his ministers, the courts and the judicial system are completely missing in action, and as a matter of fact the recently released Qaran leaders have yet to see any documentation from any governmental institution informing them of the terms of their release or even as to the reason of their release.

The difficulty for the president is that it is never an easy matter to rule by decrees and not clash with existing laws in a democracy. Having failed at getting the Qaran leaders to “ask” for a pardon and accept the ruling of the kangaroo court that illegally (in the eyes of the international and Somaliland communities) sentence them to a lengthy jail term, he unilaterally took the action of releasing them and now demands that they stop fighting for what they have been imprisoned for the last 123 days in Mandhera, or else…

There is very little chance that the leadership of Qaran and its supporters are going to cease and desist from what they see as their fundamental right to participate in the political process and veil threats from the president of future punitive actions to those who do not heed his warnings are not going to dissuade them from backing away from insisting on having access to all the rights and guarantees enshrined in the country’s Constitution.

Democracy can be a messy affair and it is by no means a perfect system, but the most important aspect of it is that it allows equal access to the process to those who adopt it as a system of governance. And Constitutional laws safeguard the rights of citizens so that no one is above the law (including the president) and equity and fairness are guaranteed to all the stakeholders in the country.

The question is not whether the country can have more than three parties, and Qaran is not making that argument, the question is whether political associations are allowed in the Constitution, and whether it guarantees the rights of the citizens to be elected into an office and to vote.

If the president insists that citizens are not allowed to form political associations and participate in the political affairs of the country, then how can he explain away article 22 of the Somaliland Constitution, which clearly states the following:


“Article 22: Political, Economic, Social and Electoral Rights

1. Every citizen shall have the right to participate in the political, economic, social and cultural affairs in accordance with the laws and the Constitution.

2. Every citizen who fulfils the requirements of the law shall have the right to be elected (to an office) and to vote.

The only legal manner in which Qaran can be denied the right to participate in the coming election is to amend this article (22) in the Somaliland Constitution and remove these fundamental rights it grants its citizens of Somaliland.

The president used the term "pardon" with deliberate care because it came with all the needed strings attached to make it possible for him to disqualify the "Qaran" politicians from running for any office while he is a candidate.

This is a direct translation of the release letter from the president:

“The president of the republic of Somaliland, having seen article 90/5 of the Somaliland Constitution, after seeing article 149 of the Penal code, having seen the judgment of the Hargeysa Regional Court MGH/DDL/424/2007, after listening to the advice of elders and Sultans, and taking into consideration the blessings of Eid Al Adxa has determined:

1. To extend a “special pardon” to erase the remainder of their jail term adjudicated by the Hargeysa Regional Court of said prisoners:

Mohamed Abdi Gaboose
Mohamed Hashi Elmi
Jamal Aydeed Ibrahim

2. I order their release before the celebration of Eid Day.”

According to a news report from the “Horn of Africa”, knowledgeable sources state that in order to diffuse the tense political situation in the country the elders who were involved in the mediation requested from the president an amnesty (Article 144 of the Penal code which grants no strings attached and all previous judgments to be vacated) for the jailed politicians instead of the partial pardon used by the president.

Furthermore Article 101/2 of the Penal code which was used by the Hargeysa Court which bans the Qaran politicians from voting or being voted for is inherited from Italy’s 1930 Mussolini’s Penal code and is in complete disagreement with Article 130/5 the current Somaliland Constitution which indicates that no law can violate Islamic law and the fundamental rights of the citizen. The Constitution being the supreme law of the land, it is clear that much of what the president has done so far goes against the letter as well as the spirit of the Constitution of the country.

The question remains whether the EU and other donor nations which have been instrumental in nudging the current administration to respect its own laws will continue to do so and insist on a full and a fair democracy to bloom in Somaliland and demand that the Qaran politicians be allowed to participate in the coming elections cycle by having the president vacate the odious Hargeysa Court judgment which is used to keep them from exercising their guaranteed Constitutional fundamental rights.

We urge all concerned communities, whether local or international to impress upon the president that the rule of law must prevail and checks and balances must be evident, the Media, all legal associations and Human Rights organizations must be free to practice their trade before democracy can be felt at the grass root level and Somaliland can rightfully claim to be truly a democratic nation.

East Africa Policy Institute.
Mahdi A. Abdi.
http://eastafricapi.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=136&Itemid=1


QARAN Leaders Will Continue To Be Banned From Politics

QARAN chairman Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gabose (center) and his two deputies Mohamed Hashi Elmi (L) and Jamal Aideed Ibrahim (R), soon after their release in Hargeysa

Hargeysa, Somaliland, December 22, 2007 (SL Times) – “The three top leaders of the QARAN political association will continue to be banned from politics despite their release from prison on Tuesday,” said Yusuf Tallabo, Somaliland's Deputy Minister of Justice.

QARAN chairman Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gabose and his two deputies Mohamed Hashi Elmi and Jamal Aideed Ibrahim were arrested on July 28 and sentenced on August 8, 2007 by a regional court to 3 years and nine months in prison. The court also banned the 3 leaders from politics for 5 years for founding an illegal organization and endangering public order through staging of political rallies.

The QARAN political association was proclaimed on April 2007. But the government has since been denying it registration as a political organization on the basis of a constitutional clause that limits the number of political parties in Somaliland to three QARAN's argument has been that whilst it true that only 3 political parties should exist in the country at any given time, it doesn't mean that those political parties should be UDUB, KULMIYE and UCID forever.

According to QARAN, the country's 3 national parties should emerge from the municipal elections which are contested once every 5 years and are constitutionally designed to produce the 3 national parties until the next local council elections.

Fearing that the formation of new political associations might endanger the existence of his weak UDUB party, Mr. Rayale responded by ordering the arrest and prosecution of Dr. Gabose, Mohamed Hashi and Jamal Aideed. Faced with countrywide protests against the imprisonment not to mention continuous international pressure, Mr. Rayale finally agreed to release the three QARAN leaders from the Mandera maximum security prison where they had been held for 144 days.

Mr. Rayale had repeatedly demanded that the prisoners petition him for clemency, but the QARAN leaders refused to do so saying that they had committed no crime and they were unjustly imprisoned for their political views. Presidnet Rayale’s release of QARAN leaders was in response to a request for amnesty by clan elders.

Around midnight Monday, the 3 men were informed by the prison guards that they were pardoned and were being taken to Hargeysa.

However on Thursday Mr. Yusuf Tallabo told a VOA reporter that the 3 QARAN leaders will not be allowed to exercise their political rights.

Until now, QARAN leaders have not been shown the text of the presidential pardon that ordered their release.

According to Dr. Gabose the government doesn't want to make the decree public so as to be able to write it down in the future as a conditional release that doesn't cover our ban from politics.

"Their plan is to invoke the order banning us from politics if we don't disband QARAN. In any case it's blackmail, and it's typical of the Rayale regime," said Gabose.

The QARAN leaders are expected to visit the Attorney General's office this morning to ask for a copy of the presidential pardon.

Under the Somaliland constitution, the president can pardon or grant amnesty to convicted individuals or a group of prisoners. But there are no bylaws or procedures for the implementation of the constitution’s article 90 regarding "pardon" and "amnesty".

In the QARAN case, the government’s prosecutor had utilized the Somalia penal code and criminal procedures code. According to that law, the Somaliland House of Representatives is to assume the power of granting an amnesty in the same way as Somalia's National Assembly was vested with such power.

Meanwhile QARAN leaders vowed to continue to exercise their political rights.

According to the Somaliland constitution (article 22), every citizen has the right to participate in the political, economic, social and cultural affairs; and every citizen has the right to elect and to be elected. Article 23 gives citizens the right for political association.

These two articles in addition to article 32 which guarantees freedom of the press, are among the articles in the constitution (bill of rights) that cannot be amended or changed by any branch of the government (see article 127 on amendments or corrections to the constitution).

Then there is law No: 14/2000 for the registration of political parties and associations. This law has not been annulled and therefore remains valid and applicable.

However the government had disbanded the registration committee in 2003 so as to avoid submission of applications for the formation of political associations in 2007.

Source: Somaliland Times
http://www.somalilandtimes.net/sl/2007/309/1.shtml

Shuro-Net Press Release

Monday, 10 December 2007

thumb_60935575_4bc871cd0c.jpg(qaransomaliland.com) Hargeysa--10/12/2007--On the occasion of the anniversary of the Human Rights Day, 10 December 2007, the Preparatory Committee of the up-coming General Meeting (GM) on 23 December 2007 and all members of the Original Shuro-net, likes to congratulate and support the Congress of the European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party (ELDR). In a letter dated 27/11/07 to the President of Somaliland, H. E. Dahir Rayale Kahin, the President of ELDR, Mrs. Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck MEP told that her party "adopted a resolution that calls upon the European Union and all of its Member States to give diplomatic recognition to the Republic of Somaliland and actively encourages the African Union to accept that Somaliland is not a secessionist state but rather a democratic entity that has abrogated a union with a failed State. However, our call is conditioned by the existence of a government that respects human rights, a free market, and democracy, with a free press and the possibility of democratic changes of government".

The reason for this is, the letter continues, "in a region of the world where these qualities are in short supply, your country is a beacon of democracy". But ELDR was alarmed by the arrest on 28/7/07 of Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gabose, Engineer Mohamed Hashi Elmi and Mr. Jama Aideed Warsame, the leaders of Qaran Political Association, which she sees can have a serious consequence for Somaliland's recognition.

In a letter to Mr. Javier Solana, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union, the ELDR President is blunter as she says "Somaliland's current political system and its leadership are failing to meet the minimum standards expected of a free and democratic State. Neither does the Somaliland government respect international human rights laws such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights". These are serious accusations.

The courageous support by one of the three main parties of the European Union is so far the best thing that happened to Somaliland's quest for international recognition. But Somaliland does not realise what it is missing. The ELDR, other supporters and friends seem to be getting wary and their goodwill is being eroded by careless Government violations against human rights and the standard pillars of democratic behaviour in Somaliland. Glaring examples are the arrest of the three top leaders of Qaran Political Association, the increasing suppression of the freedom of the press and the usurpation of the office of Shuro-net, the umbrella organization of the civil society human rights network.

The friends of Somaliland including Lord Avebury, senior member of the British House of Lords; SIRAJ; Professor I. M. Lewis; Somaliland Focus and Somaliland Forum believe that the Government's uncanny behaviour is not helping them to continue airing their support for Somaliland's international recognition. The ELDR President said, "These unlawful processes have already set the cause of Somaliland's recognition back, and if continued, must inevitably halt progress for the time being". This is a dire warning.

The GM Preparatory Committee and all members of the Original Shuro-net find it strange the Somaliland Government's attitude to ignore the many concerns of the international community as well as the frequent appeals within the country about the deteriorating situation of human rights in Somaliland. We honestly urge the Government, in particular the President H. E. Dahir Rayale Kahin, to heed the cries for caution and reverse Somaliland's sinking image in the eyes of the world. Instead of meddling in human rights issues like the freedom of the press, the arbitrary arrests of citizens and the gagging of human rights organizations, it is better to bask in the victory of Lasanod which lifts the people's spirit of patriotism and unity.

The country is passing a promising time when the population need not be pushed to desperation and mistrust, but instead given hope that at last the dark clouds of doom are lifting. Confidence building measures to break the ice that goes down well inside and outside Somaliland are: 1) the immediate and unconditional release of the leaders of Qaran Political Association, 2) the release of all detainees under the Public Order Law and 3) the abolition of the illegal Security Committees and lastly the respect of fundamental rights of Somaliland citizens.

Somaliland Human Rights Organisations Network (SHURO-Net)
Legitimate SHURO-Net Group

Thursday, 15 November 2007

The Incarceration of Qaran Leadership


To: RH Abdurrahman Mohamed Abdillahi, Chairman/Speaker

Somaliland Parliament.

cc: RH Abdul Aziz Mohamed Samale, 1st Deputy-Chairman,

Somaliland Parliament.

: RH Bashe Mohamed Farah, 2nd Deputy-Chairman,

Somaliland Parliament.

cc: RH Suleiman Mohamoud Adam, Chairman/Speaker

Somaliland House of Elders.

cc: Mr. Abdillahi Mohamed Dualeh, Minister of Foreign Affairs,

Republic of Somaliland.

cc: Mr. Oomane , Chief Justices, Supreme Court; Republic of Somaliland.

cc: Mr. Ahmed Hassan Ali, Somaliland Minister of Justice;

Republic of Somaliland.

November 12, 2007.

Your Excellencies,

On Freedom and Democracy, perhaps the words of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt will make some sense to our parliamentarians:

"It is my right to be uncommon. For I do not choose to be a common man, if I can, I seek opportunity. I do not wish to be a kept citizen, humbled and dulled by having the government look after me. I choose to take the calculated risk, to dream, to build, to fail or succeed. I choose not to barter incentive for a dole; I prefer the challenges of life to a guaranteed existence, the thrill of fulfillment to the state calm of Utopia. I will not trade my freedom for beneficence nor my dignity for a handout.

True individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made."

Franklin Delano Roosevelt [1882-1945]; thirty-second of the USA.

Subject: Detention of

1. Eng. Mohamed Hashi Elmi}

2. Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gabose} QARAN LEADERSHIP.

3. Jamal Ibrahim Aideed}

Prior to the agreement on the postponement of the municipal and Presidential elections, the three political parties secretly agreed to stonewall any possibility of forming new parties during the upcoming municipal elections. At the same time, the government has negotiated a second agreement with the RH. Mr. Suleiman Mohamoud Adam and the Chamber of the Wise men [Guurti] to draft legislation effecting the extension of the term of Office of the President by three years. Both moves are intended to deny the illegally incarcerated Qaran leadership and any another citizen to exercise the Fundamental Rights and Freedoms enshrined in our national Constitution.

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LEGISLATURE:

Acting on the Universally accepted principle that states: "Government authority is a derivative of the will of the ruled masses manifested through periodically held free and fair elections where each every citizen is accorded universal suffrage; where national constitutions are in conformity with the norms of international law; and where the articles of such constitutions are subject to amendments and/or changes to eliminate or reconcile contradictory sections; and whereas such powers are vested in the duly elected representatives [national parliament]." In other words, it is the primary duty and the sole responsibility of the 82 members of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Somaliland and they have the following two options at their disposal:

1. Draft the appropriate legislation amending of Article 9[3] of our Constitution to reflect some semblance of compatibility with Articles 21, 22, 23, and 32. Regardless of the existing procedures for the formation of new parties, the House of Representatives is the sole arbiter in this issue and they should size up to the occasion by doing the right thing; or else

2. Rewrite the wording of article 9 section 3 by inserting the following: “The three political parties with the highest votes in the first municipal elections in Somaliland shall forever remain the only three national political parties allowed in Somaliland." This simple amendment takes care of our Rights and Freedoms under articles 21-36; eliminates some of the ambiguities in the constitution; and eases the insecurity of the present three parties- the door is shut forever on all future competition.

Do our parliamentarians have the political will and the courage to make these changes in time for the coming elections? Failure to do so now and they incur wrath of an angry electorate three years from now.

THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT AND FREEDOMS OF THE CITIZEN:

The quintessence's of the incarceration of the leadership of QARAN POLITICAL ASSOCIATION is a classic case of a completely broken down Justice System and a conflated interpretation of our Constitution.

This case falls within the grey and the shady areas of our Constitution: where to draw a fine demarcation line between the Rights and the Obligations of the State and the Rights and the Freedoms of the individual. The application of the 1962 Penal code of the defunct Somali state is rather questionable when the issue is the Rights and the Freedoms of the individual. At the time of the drafting of the Somali Penal Code, the Commissioned Officers of the Somaliland Scout were under Court-martial in Mogadiscio for 'High Treason'.

Article 11 [2] of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights deals with the application of Penal Codes:

" No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed."

Here, on the one hand, we have apprehensive state machinery unprepared to handle any real or perceived challenge to its totalitarian authority. Regrettably, the custodians of the Manual of Interpretation of the articles of the Constitution had been missing in action for the past six and a half years. The Justices of the Supreme Court simply turned an appendage of the Executive Branch. The checks and balances between the three branches of our government are lost in the process.

On the other hand, we have three citizens struggling to establish a political association according to the letter and the spirit of Part Three, articles 21-36 of Somaliland Constitution- "The Rights of the Individual, Fundamental Freedoms and the Duties of the Citizen." The rights and the freedoms included in these sixteen articles are more or less identical to those included in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights of the African Union, and the European Convention on Human Rights. During the municipal elections of December, 2003, at least seven political organizations competed. Why should the rules be changed this time?

THE FORMATION POLITCAL PARTIES:

That being the case, it is noteworthy that Article 9 of our Constitution describes the political system of our nation as follows:

" Article 9: Political System

1. The political system of the Republic of Somaliland shall be based on peace, co-operation, democracy

and plurality of political parties.

2. The number of political parties in the Republic of Somaliland shall not exceed three (3).

3. A special law shall determine the procedures for the formation of a political party, but it is unlawful for any political party to be based on regionalism or clanism."

Section 1, article 9, taking the wording at face value, implies a democratic state with a multi-party political system that guarantees the citizen a range of choices at the national level. The fine print of section 2 is reasonable assuming that this measure is a safety precaution against the repetition of the experience of the March, 1969 parliamentary elections.

However, the problem is with section 3 and the law determing the establishment of political parties. If there is such a law that states that the three political parties with the highest votes in the first municipal elections in Somaliland shall remain the only three national political parties allowed in Somaliland, then the leadership of Qaran political association have violated the law of the land; otherwise, the state should reinstate the political freedom of the three incarcerated individuals.

The question is: Does the above article conform to the intent and the spirit of article 21, sections 1 and 2; article 22, sections 1 and 2; article 23, section 3 and section 4-which is subject to a wide range of interpretations; and article 32 sections 1,2, and 3, of Somaliland Constitution?"

THE CONSTITUTION OF SOMALILAND:

The drafters of our Constitution came up with the framework of a document modeled on the American system of government. Although the conspicuous absence of legal expertise has impacted the functionality of the final product, it never the less meets the basic requirements of a modern constitution. Subjected to the rigors of interpretation, the inadequacies of the blue print are now becoming more and more apparent. The interpretation of any disputed article or subtext of such an article, without an independent and impartial judicial system, is a catch-22 situation. Although this situation has paralyzed the day to day functioning of the state, that does not imply that the nation is facing serious constitutional crisis.

The choice of this model of governance, over other comparable systems, was to ascertain the establishment of state institutions whose jurisdictions are clearly defined- a system of checks and balances where no single institution oversteps the limits of its authorities. Some of the real problems with our current constitution are:

1. Nine or ten articles of our Constitution carry more clout than the rest of the other one hundred twenty or so articles;

2. The apparent inequity in the delegation of powers among the different branches of the government;


3. The absence of a transparent mechanism to reconcile contradictory or ambiguous articles;

4. Most of the byelaws defining some critical sections of the constitution are incomplete;

5. The Chamber of the Wise men [Guurti] is a natural impediment to all legislation drafted and enacted by the House of Representatives.

Sooner or later, these serious problems should be addressed. The above factors shifted the equilibrium in favour of the Executive Branch, or better still, our government is no better than a motor vehicle driving at night on the wrong side of the highway with the headlights turned off. A unidirectional system of governance [ONE WAY TRAAFFIC] is more than we bargained for.

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS ON PERSONAL FREEDOMS:

Pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as adopted and proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly Resolution number 217[III] of December 10,1948 the following Human Rights and fundamental Freedoms are guaranteed:

1: UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

Article 1: "Equality in the freedom of dignity and rights for all persons";

Article 2: " Entitlement to the rights and freedoms of the

Declaration regardless of Language, Race, Religion,

Gender, Colour, Political opinion, Social or National

Origin, Property or Social Status";

Article 3: “The right to life, liberty, and security of person";

Article 5: "Prohibition against all forms of degrading and

inhumane punishment";

Article 6: "The right to be recognized as a person before the courts

of law";

Article 7: "Equality before the law without discrimination"

Article 8: "The right to seek restitution before qualified or tribunals";

Article 9: "No arbitrary detentions or incarcerations";

Article 10: "The right to a fair and speedy trial by an impartial court of law";**

Article 11-1- " Presumption of innocence for all penal crimes";

Article 18: "Freedom of thought, conscience, and Religion"

Article 19: " Freedom of Opinion and Expression and the

residual right to disseminate information

through the media, etc."

Article 20: “Freedom of Assembly and Association";

Article 21-1- " The right to participate government directly

Or through elected representation"

21-2- " The right to access public services";

2: HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS OF THE AFRICAN UNION

Furthermore, the Organization of African Unity Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights as adopted on June 27, 1981 also guarantees the following fundamental Human Rights:

Articles: 3,5, 19, 26: " Equality before the Law";

Articles: 3 and 7: " Right to a fair and speedy trial";**

Articles: 5,6, and 9: " Right to Liberty";

Articles: 8, 13, 20: " Civil and political Rights";

Articles: do,11, 13: " Freedom of Association and Assembly";

3: EUROPEAN UNION CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

And according to with the European Convention on Human Rights as adopted in 1950 "to Protect Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms" as enshrined in the following articles:

Article 2: " The Right to Life";

Article 3: " Prohibition of Torture";

Article 5: " Right to Liberty and Security of Person";

Article 6: " Right to a Fair Trial";**

Article 7: " Harsh and Cruel Punishment";

Article 9: " Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion";

Article10: " Right to Freedom of Expression";

Article11: " Right to Freedom of Assembly and Association";

Article13: " Right to Restitution- Effective Remedy";

Article14: " Prohibition of Discrimination"

The Rights and the Freedoms guaranteed under our Constitution are in conformity with those adopted by the United Nations Organization, the European Union, and the African Union. If some sections of Somaliland Constitution are deliberately in contravention of these universal laws, our legislatures should rectify immediately all shortcomings with due diligence.

May Allah Bless the People and the Nation of Somaliland.

Ahmed Ali Ibrahim Sabeyse

Email:asabeyse@hotmail.com

Scarborough, ON. Canada.

_____________________________________________________________________

** The right to an impartial and independent tribunal is embodied in Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217, and U.N. Doc. A/811 (1948). This right is also incorporated in Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, G.A. Res. 2200 (XXI), U.N. GAOR, 21st Sess., Supp. No. 16, at 52, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966). European countries included this right in Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, adopted Nov. 4, 1950, art. 27, 213 U.N.T.S. 222, 228; and articles 3 and 7 of the Human and Peoples' Rights of African Union, adopted by the OAU on June 27, 1981.


Wednesday, 31 October 2007

Violations of Human Rights of the Government of Somaliland and the Detention of Qaran Political Association leaders


Office Telephone: 252 2 517269/ 252 24112633/252 2 4409125/25224481219

E-mail: shuro4rights@gmail.com

Hargeisa, Somaliland

Ref/SHURO-Net/ 0326 /07 Date: 17/10/07

To: H.E. Dahir Rayale Kahin

President of the Republic of Somaliland

Hargeisa

Somaliland

Og: All Human Rights Organizations in/outside Somaliland

Og: All Free Press in/outside Somaliland

Subject: Violations of Human Rights of the Government of Somaliland and the Detention of Qaran Political Association leaders

The umbrella organization Shuro-net is the umbrella of all the human rights organizations in Somaliland, which come from all the regions of the country. The main objective of Shuro-net is the development and protection of all the basic rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Somaliland Constitution and the Instruments of the Universal Human Rights.

Considering this lofty ideal, Shuro-net aims this press release to help stop and prevent the violations of the Somaliland Government against human rights and to avoid any thing that can affect the peacefulness of Somaliland.

Knowing the postponement of the Local Government elections, Shuro-net, carefully following the human rights situation and watching the progress of the democracy taking root in Somaliland, is worried when it examined deeply the increasing violations of human rights of the Somaliland Government. This can have a serious effect on the nations’ request for recognition and wide spread justice in Somaliland.

In that case, when the Security Committees lead any one they want to gaol without bringing one to court of justice which is a violation of the law of the land; when the national judiciary is not independent of the Executive Branch of the Government; when the citizen who talks against the Government is arrested without any crime committed; when the freedom of the press does not really exist in the country, at the same time the Somaliland Government uses one of the most draconian laws in the world to harass its citizens; when the Government refuses people the right to demonstrate peacefully under the pretext of keeping the peace; when the supporters of Qaran Political Association are arrested without any court warrant; when you add to this the illegal detention of Qaran Political Association leaders who are still languishing in Mandera Prison, how can Somaliland claim it is a democratic country that respects human rights.

Detention without trial

Generally, in all the prisons of Somaliland are kept many people who were not brought before a court of justice, but the National and Regional Security Committees applied for their detention the so-called Public Order Law which the previous Parliament abolished with a strong vote in the middle of 1999.

On 12/10/07 at around 7 A.M. the police in Burao arrested and took to the central prison Mr. Muhyadin Mursal Abdi Gabose and Mr. Ali Mohamoud Habi nicknamed “Ali-Babur”. No legal process what so ever was followed for the arrest of these two elders who are members of the Gabose family.

Shuro-net, referring to Article 9 (1) of the International Law of Civil and Political Rights, which says that no one can be unlawfully arrested or detained, no one can be deprived of one’s liberties without due process of law; also referring to Article 9 of the Universal Human Rights and Article 25 (2) of the Somaliland Constitution, strongly condemns these illegal arrests by Somaliland Government authorities.

Like wise, the detention of the two elder, Mursal Abdi Gabose and Ali-Babur caused armed violent youths to storm the Burao Central Police Station to free the detainees. This incident between the police and the youths in which fire arms were exchanged caused the following deaths and injuries to people:

  1. Dama Abdi Jama – dead
  2. Farah Ali Mohamed – dead (police man)
  3. Suldan Mohamed Ajab – injured
  4. Hassan Said Sarwel – injured
  5. Mohamed Hassan Aideed – injured
  6. Bidar Muse Weyd – injured (police man)
  7. Faysal Ali Damal – injured

It is not the first time the Somaliland Government arrested the supporters of Qaran Political Association, but as is clear in the Human Rights Register, the Somaliland Government arrested on the night of 10 October 2007 Mr. Mahdi Jama Omer and Mr. Mohamed Abdi Jibril who did not do any crime while the police were not carrying any warrant of arrest. Shuro-net is against the unlawful arrest of civilians without due process of law. We also don’t support the people to take the law into their own hands, which can endanger the existence of Somaliland.

The detention of the leaders of Qaran Political Association

The leaders of Qaran Political Association were taken to Mandera Prison on 28 July 2007, when the Government accused them of having formed an illegal political party that violates the Constitution. Shuro-net, the human rights umbrella that closely and carefully followed this case, has confirmed the arrest of these leaders was against the justice and human rights guaranteed by the Somaliland Constitution. The President of Somaliland, H. E. Dahir Rayale Kahin has made it conditional for the release of the three leaders Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gabose, Engineer Mohamed Hashi Elmi and Mr. Jamal Aideed Ibrahim, who are detained for their believe, to ask for his pardon. Shuro-net sees this demand for a pardon to be an obstacle being put in front of the political rights of the leaders of Qaran Political Association as well as the execution of the agreement between the President and National Councils that resulted from the mediation of the Voluntary Committee that settled the nagging differences between the National Government Councils. For this reason, Shuro-net is calling the Government of Somaliland to restore to the leaders of Qaran Political Association their freedom earliest possible, and to settle the differences with them through dialogue and understanding.

Advice

Shuro-nit is calling the Government of Somaliland to:

  1. Release as soon as possible with out condition all detainees in Somaliland prisons that kept there with out the order of a court of law.
  2. Restore to the leaders of Qaran Political Association their freedom as soon as possible.
  3. Stop the unlawful arrest of citizens and instead to follow the due process of law to detain people.
  4. Must bring before the law all government officers and functionaries of law enforcement agencies in Somaliland who commit violations against human rights and stop them, as happens now, to use the national uniforms as the shields to cover their bad deeds.

Zamzam Abdi Adan Mubarik Ibrahim Aar

Chairperson Shuro-net Director Shuro-net

Monday, 8 October 2007

Letter from The Rt Hon Lord Malloch-Brown on Arrests of Qaran Politicians

Letter from The Rt Hon Lord Malloch-Brown Minister of State to Lord Avebury, 16th Sept 2007

The Rt Hon Lord Avebury MP
House of Lords

London
SW1A OPW

Dear Lord Avebury,


Thank you for your letter of 20 August about making representations to the Somaliland Authorities regarding the arrest and detention of three politicians on 28 July 2007. I am replying as Minister responsible for Africa


The Government has been encouraged by the very good progress that the Somaliland authorities have made on democracy and stability. However we recognise that further improvements in democratization and governance are needed. We are actively encouraging, and provide significant assistance to, the Somaliland authorities to ensure progress is maintained.


We too have been concerned by some of the recent events, including the arrest and detention of members of the Qaran Association. Progress on democratisation is a major asset to Somaliland’s ambitions and any regression will affect the international community’s view of them.


The UK joined other international partners in August 2007 in sending, through the Somali Democratisation Steering Committee, a strong message to President Riyale requesting the Somaliland authorities address the detention of Qaran Association members. This letter also pointed out that donors will continue to invest in Somaliland on the basis of progress on democratisation being maintained.



The Rt Hon Lord Malloch-Brown
Minister of State

Source: Lord Avebury

The Delayed Release of Imprisoned QARAN Leaders: Procedural Hurdles?


The Delayed Release of Imprisoned QARAN Leaders: Procedural Hurdles?

By Ibrahim Hashi Jama
www.somalilandlaw.com

22 September 2007

The EPMP negotiated agreement

Somalilanders everywhere welcomed recently the announced settlement on 20 th August 2007 of some of the disputes between the President and the House of Representatives which have been raging almost since the directly elected House took office in October 2005. The settlement which was facilitated by an Eminent Persons Mediation Panel (EPMP) (consisting of famous poets, academics and religious leaders[1]) included the release from prison of t he Chairman and the two Deputy Chairmen of Qaran political association, Dr. Mohamed Abdi Gaboose, Mr Mohamed Hashi Elmi and Mr Jamal Aideed , who were arrested on 28 July 2007 and were sentenced, by a Regional Court on 19 August 2007, to imprisonment of three years and nine months, as well as an automatic disqualification from public office[2] (and, even, from the right to vote) for 5 years.

The EPMP settlement term relating to the QARAN leaders, which was one of the three[3] main terms, was worded as follows:

“3. That the three imprisoned politicians be released, their political rights and freedoms be restored and that matters which they raised are considered by others[4] whilst they are free. It is incumbent on them that they must not undertake any campaigns which would harm the public order.”

In Somali:

“3. in saddexdii siyaasi ee la xidhay la sii daayo, xorriyadoodii siyaasadeedna la siiyo, arrinka ay ku doodayaana lala eego, iyagoo debeda jooga. Waxaa iyagana lagga rabaa inanay gelin abaabul nabadgelyada wax yeela.”

The House of Representatives promptly fulfilled the settlement term addressed to it (i.e the first of the main three terms, which related to the disputed nominations to the National Electoral Commission[5]) and the EPMP then started expressing their concerns, in public interviews, about the delayed implementation of the terms which the President agreed to fulfil. The widespread concern about the continued imprisonment of the QARAN leaders was manifested in public demonstrations held in Hargeisa and Burao on 12 September 2007, which were promptly condemned by the Government as being illegal and politically motivated.

The EPMP members, in an interview on 7 September 2007, confirmed that they have asked the President to consider ways of releasing the QARAN leaders without the latter submitting requests for a pardon, but in a widely publicised interview, following the demonstrations, the President insisted, on 13 September 2007, that he will agree to a pardon on condition that the three leaders request it formally. The President repeated that he is prepared to pardon them but he knows no other way than for the leaders to petition for clemency. This same view was expressed by the Secretary General of the governing party and, in an unnecessarily confrontational interview, by the Deputy Minister of Justice. The QARAN leaders have already repeatedly stated that they have not committed any crimes and therefore do not seek any pardon, and in any case the Mediation process was conducted between the President and the House of Representatives, which considered the QARAN leaders’ imprisonment as amounting to an issue of conflict between them and the Government.

A procedural hurdle?

It has been over a month since the mediation agreement was announced, and despite the President’s agreement that the QARAN leaders will be released, they are still in jail in Mandhera prison. Whatever the reasons for the delay in the release of the QARAN leaders are, the President’s expressed difficulties appear to be based on the procedural issue as to how the release should be effected. Both the President[6] and his Deputy Justice Minister stated that there is no other “legal” way that the release could be done other than through a formal request for a pardon, whilst the EPMP and QARAN leaders argue that as the release has been agreed in principle, all that it needs is for the President to implement it by a decree. The President and his advisers appear to be relying on the procedural Article 255 of the 1963 Somali Criminal Procedure (CPC) which deals only with individual pardons requested by convicted prisoners and which states as follows:

“Measures relating to Pardon & Conditional Release

  • An appeal for pardon or for conditional release shall be addressed to the President of the Republic and sent to the Attorney General. The appeal shall be signed:
  • by the convicted person,
  • by a descendant, ascendant or spouse of the convicted person.
  • Pardon or conditional release shall be granted by decree of the President of the Republic, having heard the Minister of Grace & Justice and the Attorney General.
  • In so far as possible, the provisions of Article 254[7] shall apply with regard to the implementation of the decree.”

As explained further below, neither indult, which is a type of impersonal “pardon” applying to all persons in a specific category, nor amnesty are covered by this procedural article, which is aimed at specific “personal” requests for pardons. In any case, amnesty is much wider than pardon in that it can cover not only persons convicted by courts, but also persons who have not even been charged with an offence.

Given the agreement, in principle, for the release of the QARAN leaders, I explore below the options, other than the Article 255 of the CPC route, which are open to the President if, as he has repeatedly stated, he still minded to fulfil his widely publicised declaration to release the imprisoned QARAN leaders.

Somaliland presidential powers

Other than Article 90(5)[8] of the Somaliland Constitution which gives the President the power to exercise pardon and amnesty (cafis iyo saamaxaadda, in Somali), no other laws dealing with this matter have been passed by the Somaliland parliament. To understand the range of these powers, therefore, one needs to examine the provisions of the Somali Penal Code (1962) and the Somali Criminal Procedure Code (1963) which are both still in use in the Republic of Somaliland and which were the statutes[9] used in the case mounted against the the QARAN leaders. In turn, both of these Codes were linked to the 1960 Somali Republic Constitution[10] and an examination of all the three, as well international comparisons, will shed some light on the definition and legal effects of the concepts of “pardon and amnesty” in current Somaliland law.

Whilst the Arabic versions of the words “cafis iyo saamaxaad” are practically interchangeable, there would have been no need for the inclusion of both words in the Somaliland Constitution if they both meant the same. The fact that the two words have been used, and, in the light of the existing Somali law still in force in Somaliland, there are two concepts, which can be translated as “pardon” and “amnesty” that the Constitution is addressing. If that is not the case, and the Somaliland President has the power[11] to “pardon“only, but not the power to grant “amnesty”, then the Somaliland Parliament will have to assume that power, which incidentally, in the 1960 Constitution laid with National Assembly[12], although the latter could delegate it by law to the President, whilst the President was given the power to exercise “pardon”[13]. It should be noted, however that in presidential systems, like the US, where the Constitution[14] does not mention “amnesty”, the power to pardon has been interpreted as including the power to grant amnesty[15] by presidential proclamation.

Broadly, as set out by a US court "Amnesty is the abolition and forgetfulness of the offence; pardon is forgiveness"[16]. Amnesty usually applies to offences whilst pardon applies to specific persons, or in the form of indult, to all persons in a specific category. Also in some countries, including the Somali Republic of 1960-69, amnesty traditionally required a law passed by parliament, but some of Presidential systems (e.g the new Eastern European constitutions) assign both powers to the President[17].

Following the Somali Republic Constitution and replicating, word for word, the Italian Penal Code (the Rocco Code), the 1962 Somali Penal Code deals with pardon and amnesty separately. Pardons are dealt with by Article 149 of the Penal Code which refers to “indult and pardon”, the effect of which is that it

“shall constitute condonation, wholly or in part, of the punishment imposed or shall commute it to another punishment…”

“Indult” is a form of a “general pardon” which applies to all persons in a specific category, and hence is impersonal, whilst a “pardon” applies to a specific person, but neither extinguishes linked accessory penalties. A pardon (or an indult) under Article 149 of the Code, therefore, remits only in whole or in part the main punishment imposed (prison or fine etc), but UNLESS the decree provides it explicitly, it does not stop the accessory punishments, such as interdiction (disqualification) from public office, to which the QARAN leaders have been sentenced under the automatic, and in the light of modern human rights law, obsolete provision of Article 102(1)[18] of the Penal Code.

Amnesty is dealt with in the Somali Penal Code under Article 144. Unlike pardons, amnesty extinguishes the offence, as well as the punishment, including any linked accessory penalties, such as interdiction (disqualification) from public office. Amnesty is not just confined to cover criminal charges brought or to criminal convictions in respect of an offence, but it also covers the likely commission of the offence itself. Amnesty is often used for “political” offences and for securing reconciliation and peace.

There are no published procedures for the grant of pardon or amnesty by the Somaliland Presidents, but in the last few years both Presidents Egal and Rayale have exercised this power in connection with:

Individual pardons.

  • Indults or general pardons to groups of prisoners, sometimes, during Eid[19], in which case, there were no pre-condition that the individual prisoners submit petitions under Article 255 of the CPC.
  • Amnesty[20] in respect of, for example, those Somaliland persons who attended the Arta Somalian Conference although there was an understandable condition that such persons must first return to Somaliland and request the amnesty formally, as an indication of their allegiance to Somaliland.

In practice, it is the only the first category of individual or personal pardons that the procedures for petitions under Article 255 of the CPC is relevant.

The procedural alternatives to an Article 255 (CPC) pardon

In short, unless President Rayale and his legal advisers believe that he has no power to grant an “amnesty”, in which case this power will now lie with the Parliament, there are two alternatives to individual and personal pardons and these are a general pardon (indult) or an amnesty.

QARAN’s case does have many of the hallmarks of an issue that is suitable for an amnesty, (or failing that a general pardon). The case:

  • concerns a national political and constitutional issue, which was accepted as such by the House of Representatives and explains why it ended up being seen as part of the subjects of dispute between the House of Representatives and the President;
  • involves problems based on fundamental political rights and freedoms, the resolution of which are crucial to the onward advance of democracy in Somaliland;
  • raises issues which go beyond QARAN and also affect the other declared political associations[21] and those waiting in the wings, which are vying for possible participation in the forthcoming local elections in December 2007; and
  • is likely to affect public order and peace if the continued imprisonment of the QARAN leaders lasts and the underlying issues remain unresolved.

An amnesty which covers not just the QARAN leaders, but also all those who were engaged in setting up the new political associations declared this year readiness for the local government elections in December 2007 will ensure that a line is drawn under what has happened so far and will, as set out in the EPMP agreement then allow time for a serious national discussion the constitutional position in respect of the issues raised by QARAN and others and the other new associations that have, so far, been declared.

Should the President and his legal advisers feel that he has no power to issue an amnesty, the same result can be achieved by the a presidential decree providing an indult (general pardon) in the same format, but adding, for the avoidance of doubt, that the indult also includes all accessory penalties imposed in any relevant conviction. The draft presidential decree ( set out in the attached appendix in Somali) therefore includes references to both an amnesty and an indult, as a belt and braces approach which has indeed been the approach adopted in an “indult” presidential decree on Eid 2003, on which this draft is based. This draft presidential decree covers:

  • only the new political associations declared so far during 2007; and
  • is confined to any possible offences, charges or convictions under the Penal Code (and not civil matters) relating to all aspects of the formation, organisation, meetings, assembly, publicity etc of the new political associations in 2007 and up to the date of the amnesty/general pardon decree;
  • makes clear, for the avoidance of doubt, that all the accessory penalties of anyone convicted by court in respect of this matter, as well as the main punishment, are covered by decree;
  • exhorts all such associations, persons to safeguard the public order, as agreed in the EPMP agreement; and
  • comes into effect on the date of its signature by the President.

Final comments

I have heard yet no substantive reasons why the agreed release of the QARAN leaders should not be implemented, and I have addressed the Article 255 CPC point in this article. It is my fervent hope, and that of many Somalilanders, that the delays in the already agreed release of the QARAN leaders have indeed been due to procedural issues only and that the goodwill shown by the President and the House in reaching the EPMP agreement, in the first place, will hopefully come through. The nation (and those of us living abroad) was elated by the successful conclusion of the EPMP agreement on 20 August 2007, which came after the so many false previous dawns promised by the “turxaan-bixin” exercise in 2005 and would urge the President not to let this specific EPMP agreement term fall by the wayside. Whatever political concerns there may be about other EPMP terms relating to the 2007 budget and other constitutional issues, this one concerns the liberties of three citizens who have already been in prison since July 2007. As their release has already been agreed, in principle, surely arguments about procedural matters should not continue to delay their release, especially in this month of Ramadan.

Footnotes

[1] The EPMP, which was formally known as “the Committee for the Resolution of Disputes between the National Councils” (i.e the Council of Government and the Houses of Parliament) consisted of the following members:

  1. Maxamed Ibraahim Warsame (Hadraawi)
  2. Sh. Maxamed Sh. Cumar Dirir
  3. Maxamed Xaashi Dhamac (Gaarriye)
  4. Sh. Ismaaciil Cabdi Hurre
  5. Sheekh Yuusuf Aadan Maxamed
  6. Maxamed Siciid Gees
  7. Prof. Saleebaan Axmed Guuleed
  8. Dr. Aadan Yuusuf Abokor
  9. Siciid Axmed Maxamuud

[2] Article 102(1) of the 1962 Somali Penal Code states: “..... A sentence of imprisonment for a crime for a term of not less than 3 years shall entail ... disqualification from public office for a period of 5 years....”. Article 101(3) explains that temporary disqualification “shall deprive the convicted person of the capacity to acquire, exercise or enjoy during the period of disqualification rights, offices, services, qualities, titles and honours”. The rights are listed in Clause 2 (a) to (g) of the same Article, and include “the right to vote or to be elected and every other political right” and the rights to hold public office, academic positions, stipend or pensions of the state etc. These provision mirror Articles 32 and 28 of the 1930 Italian Penal Code.

[3] The other two terms were:

  • That the two Guurti nominees for membership of the (Electoral) Commission be re-submitted to the House of Representatives for a vote.
  • That the (2007) Budget be implemented as approved by the House of Representatives.

In Somali:

  • In Golaha Wakiillada marlabaad la horgeeyo labadii Xubnood ee Guurtidu, komiishanka u soo magacowday oo loo Codeeyo.
  • In Miisaaniada loogu dhaqmo sidii Golaha Wakiiladu ku ansixiyeen.

[4] Including, presumably, the Government.

[5] The House re-considered on 27 August 2007 the two Guurti nominees and rejected them again, and then considered their replacements on 3 September 2007 and endorsed their appointments with an overwhelming majority.

[6] For example, the President, in his BBC interview on 13 September 2007, stated that he knew no other way to release of the QARAN leaders unless they applied for a pardon (presumably under Article 255 of the CPC, above)

[7] This Article confirms that after the offence and punishment becomes extinct (as a result of a pardon), the court shall declare it so.

[8] “Article 90: The Powers of the President

The President is the Head of the nation and the state, and is the symbol of the unity of the citizens of the Republic of Somaliland. He is responsible for the care of the nation’s resources, the protection of the peace, the advancement of the society and the proper conduct of the administration of the state. In order to fulfil these responsibilities, the President shall have following powers:
.......

  • Without prejudice to the principles of just retaliation (Qisas) and the limits under Islamic Sharia, the exercise of pardon and amnesty, and the grant of political asylum after consultation with the appropriate bodies.”

[9] The charges against the three leaders were laid under Articles 231, 505 and 510 of the Penal Code.

[10] It is no accident that many provisions of the “democratic” Somali Republic 1960 Constitution have been reflected in the Somaliland Constitution.

[11] In view of Somaliland’s history of dictatorial government (during the 70s and 80s) which the preamble to the Constitution points out, Article 90, lists the powers of the President and limits them to those given to him by the Constitution and other laws. This therefore re-emphasises that Somaliland’s presidential powers are based on the constitution and the law and not on a general prerogative or stewardship power. The preamble is a guide to the interpretation of the constitution and its call for vigilance against dictatorship means that the powers of the Presidency and the executive have to be interpreted narrowly and strictly within the provisions of the constitution and the laws. Note also that even the emergency and war making powers of the President are also circumscribed in Article 92.

[12] See Article 64 of the Somali Republic Constitution 1960:

“Amnesty and Indult

1. The power of granting amnesty and indult may be delegated to the President of the Republic by a law approved by the Assembly, by a two-third majority of the deputies.

2. Amnesty and indult may not be granted in respect of offences committed after the presentation of the draft law on the delegation of powers.”

[13] Article 75 of the Somali Republic Constitution 1960:

“Powers and Duties

The President of the Republic shall exercise the functions conferred upon him by the Constitution and by law, in the legislative, executive and judicial fields. In addition, he shall:
…..

c) grant pardon and commute sentences;”

[14] The US Constitution (Article II, S.2) uses the phrase “reprieves and pardons for offenses against the US except in cases of impeachment”, but this has been held to include full pardon, conditional pardon, commutation, remission, and reprieve .

[15] President Carter, for example, proclaimed that all persons convicted of certain offences under the Selective Service Act were to be unconditionally pardoned, and all pending cases closed.

[16] State v. Blalock , 61 N.C. (Phil. Law) 242, 247 (1867).

[17] An example is the Moldava Constitution.

[18] See footnote 2 above for the details of Article 102. Automatic blanket denial of voting rights to convicted persons have been held to be contrary to modern human rights – see, for example the the Canadian Supreme Court case of Sauve v. Chief Electoral Officer of Canada (1995) 132 DLR (4th) 136, and the ECHR decision of Hirst v. United Kingdom (No.2) of March 2004.

[19] One of the last “indult” presidential decrees was on 09/02/2003 when 368 prisoners were offered an indult, with the decree specifically excluding persons convicted of various listed offences.

[20] One other main example of an amnesty in Somaliland, which predated the Constitution, is the one agreed between the Somaliland communities at the Burao 1991 Grand Conference.

[21] QARAN was declared on 5 April 2007. Although it is not clear how substantive their support was, a political association called Badbaado was declared on 27 June 2007 and another one called Gude Gude was declared on 25 July 2007.

APPENDIX: DRAFT Presidential Decree based on Previous “General” Pardon Decrees

Madaxweynaha Jamhuuriyadda Somaliland:

Markuu arkay : Qodobka 90aad, xubintiisa 5aad ee Distoorka Jamhuuriyadda Somaliland oo ku saabsan awoodaha Madaxweynaha ee Cafiska iyo Samaaxaada;

Markuu arkay : Qodobka Qodobka 149aad ee Xeerka Ciqaabta Guud oo ku saabsan Cafiska Guud iyo kan gaarka iyo Qodobka 144aad ee Xeerka Ciqaabta Guud ee Ku saabsan Saamaxaada (Amnesty);

Markuu aqbalay : Soojeedintii uu ka aqbalay Gudida Dhexdhexaadinta Golayaasha Qaranka;

Markuu tixgeliyey : In ay haboon tahay in la sameeyo saamaxaad ama cafis guud si loo afjaro arrimihii muranku ka jiray;

Markuu go’aansady: In ay ay waqtigan xasaasiga ah, talaabadani ay maslaxada guud ee wadanaka iyo umudda faai’do u tahay

Wuxuu soo saaray Xeerkan:

Qodobka 1aad

Madaxweynaha Jamhuuriyadda Somaliland wuxu Saamaxaad iyo Cafis Guud u fidiyey dhamaan cid kasta oo lagu eedeeyey dembi ku xusan Xeerka Ciqaabta Guud, ama lagu xukumay ciqaab ku saleysan dembi caynkaas, oo ku saabsan sameynta, abaabulka, shirarka, dhaqdhaqaaqa, hadaladda, qoraalada iyo hawlaha la xhidhiidha ururada siyaasada ee cusub ee jiritaankooda lagaga dhawaaqay wadanka sanadkan 2007.

Qodobka 2aad

Saamaxaadan iyo Cafiskan Guud:

  • wuxuu ku eg yahay wax allaahe wixii dacdo eh ee ku saabsan arrimaha ku xusan Qodobka 1aad ee dhacay ka hor maalinta uu Xeerkani dhanqangalay;
  • mana saamaynayo xuquuqaha madaniga ah ee dadweynaha ee la xidhiidha arrimaha kus xusan Qodobka 1aad ee Xeerkan.

Qodobka 3aad

Si shaki looga saaro (for the avoidance of doubt), Samaxaadan iyo Cafiskan Guud, sida ku xusan Qodobka 144aad ee Xeerka Ciqaabta Guud, way tirtireysa dhamaan dembiga iyo ciqaabta guud ee ku xusan Qodobka 90aad ee Xeerka Ciqaabta Guud iyo ciqaabta gaarka ah ee wahilisa eek u xusan Qodobada 92/93 ee Xeerka Ciqaabta Guud, ee lagu xukumay qof kasta oo ka mid ah dadka ku xusan Qodobka 1aad ee Xeerkan.

Qodobka 4aad

Waxa dhamaan dadka Samaxaadan iyo Cafiskan Guud loo fidiyey la xasuusinaya in ay ilaaliyaan xasilloonida guud iyo nabadgelyada.

Qodobka 5aad

Xeerkani wuxu hirgelayaa marka uu saxeexo Madaxweynuhu, waana in ay Saamaxaadan iyo Cafiskan Guud fuliyaan isla markiiba Xeer-ilaaliyaha Guud, Taliyeyaasha Xabsiyada iyo Booliiska iyo Garsoorayaasha Maxkmadaha ee ku haboon.

By Ibrahim Hashi Jama
www.somalilandlaw.com

Source: Somaliland Times

http://www.somalilandtimes.net/sl/2007/296/050.shtml